Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood Village
Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood VillageWind plants in Ontario as of Dec. 31, 2008

Number of Turbines = 429

Max. Capacity : 703 MW per hour

Actual Production = approx. 30% or 211 MW per hour

Approx 30,000 hectares of lands were optioned for wind power development in Ontario to accomodate the above turbines, much of it was useable farmland.

Carbon dioxide emissions calculated to have been displaced (if claims are accurate): 430grams x 211MW per hr. = approx. 91,000 grams per hour.

. ...more

While not advocating for nuclear power over wind power, it is noteworthy that Ontario would need more than 1200 wind turbines and almost 100,000 hectares in order to be able to shut down ONE nuclear station equivalent to Bruce A G3. You do the math - there are 14 nuclear plants in Ontario today.


Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood VillageJohn Laforet hits the mark with every entry.
Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood VillageSite Index

 

SavetheBluffs.ca
Stop Offshore Wind Farm for Toronto Beaches and Scarborough Bluffs


Summary of power contribution of existing wind plants in Ontario as of  Dec. 31, 2008 -

Grand Total for the following Wind Farms:
AMARANTH, KINGSBRIDGE, PORT ALMA, PORT BURWELL, PRINCEFARM, RIPLEY SOUTH
(
Information not available for Underwood)

Number of Turbines = 429
Max. Capacity : 703 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% or 211 MW per hour
Approx 30,000 hectares of lands were optioned for wind power development in Ontario to accomodate the above turbines, much of it was useable farmland.
Carbon dioxide emissions calculated to have been displaced (if claims are accurate): 430grams x 211MW per hr. = approx. 91,000 grams per hour.
See note at bottom of page.

The Bruce A - G3 Nuclear Station produces approx. 720 MW per hour according to http://www.sygration.com/gendata/today.html

While not advocating for nuclear power over wind power, it is noteworthy that Ontario would need almost 1300 wind turbines and over 90,000 hectares (900 sq. km.) in order to be able to shut down ONE nuclear station equivalent to Bruce A G3.
I have used nuclear for comparison since it appears to generate the highest yield.

In Ontario at the time of this comparison we have 14 nuclear plants. At this rate it would take over 12,600 sq. km. and over 18,000 turbines to create the same power that we depend on nuclear for. The size of Ontario is about 1,300,000 sq. km.




Since I have been unsuccessful in finding Cndn data of costing and subsidies, I am using US data below.

Cost per unit of energy produced was estimated in 2006 to be comparable to the cost of new generating capacity in the United States for coal and natural gas: wind cost was estimated at $55.80 per MWh, coal at $53.10/MWh and natural gas at $52.50 and $59.30 per MWh for Nuclear.
See chart at bottom of page.

A 2008 US Energy Information Administration report concluded that just some of the federal subsidies for wind energy amount to $23+ per megawatt-hour. By contrast, normal coal receives 44¢ per megawatt-hour, natural gas 25¢, hydroelectric 67¢, and nuclear power $1.59. In addition to these, there are significant state subsidies and mandates. See How We Got Here

Also from See How We Got Here No independent scientific study has ever shown that wind power saves a meaningful amount of CO2. In fact, the most independent scientific study done (by the National Academy of Sciences) says the opposite. Their 2007 report concludes that (assuming the most optimistic conditions) the U.S. CO2 savings by 2020 will amount to only 1.8%. An earlier EIA report said 1.3%. These are trivial quantities!





Melancthon I Wind Plant (67.5 MW) - Melancthon TWP
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5104

Approximately 2,500 hectares of lands were optioned for wind power development
within the Township of Melancthon in southern Ontario.

Annual Production approx. 177,000 megawatt-hours per year.
24x365=8760 hrs. x 67.5 = 591.300 MW x 30% = 177,000

45 GE 1.5 MW model sle Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 67.5 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 21 MW/Hr


Melancthon II Wind Plant (132 MW) - Amaranth/Melancthon TWP
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=5024&ContentID=5105

Approximately 4,860 hectares of land were optioned for wind power development
within the Townships of Amaranth and Melancthon, near the Town of Shelburne, in southern Ontario.

Annual Production approx. 350,000 megawatt-hours per year

Turbines: 88 GE 1.5 MW model sle Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 132 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 40 MW/Hr

Total Melancthon/Amaranth 45 + 88 = 133 1.5 MW turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 132 + 67.5 = 199.5MW per hour




Kingsbridge - near Goderich, Ontario
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5100

Approx. 1,000 hectares of farmland optioned for wind power development
within the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh, near the community of Goderich in Huron County.

Annual Production approx. 109,000 megawatt-hours per year.

22 X 1.8 MW V80
Nameplate Capacity: 39.6 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 12 MW/Hr




Port Alma, Ontario
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5102

over 4800 hectares of farmland optioned for wind power development
near Port Alma, Ontario in the municipality of Chatham Kent.

OPA states Annual Production approx. 300,000 megawatt-hours per year. 
 30% is less than 266,000 megawatt-hours - Is OPA overstating the expected annual production??

44 Siemens 2.3 MW Mark II Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 101.2 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 31 MW/Hr




Port Burwell, Ontario - Erie Shores
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5099

Over 5,260 hectares of farmland is optioned for wind power development
in the townships of Bayham and Malahide in the Elgin County and the Old Houghton Township in the Norfolk County.

Annual Production approx. 260,000 megawatt-hours per year.

66 GE 1.5MW sle Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 99 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 30 MW/Hr




Prince TWP I Wind Power Project - Sault Ste. Marie District, Ontario
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5106

2,500 hectares of lands optioned for wind power development
in the Algoma region within the townships of Aweres, Dennis, Pennefather, and Prince.

Annual Production approx. 260,000 megawatt-hours per year.

66 GE 1.5 MW sle Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 99 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 30 MW/Hr



Prince II Wind Power Project (90 MW)
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5107

5,200 hectares of lands optioned for wind power development
in the Algoma region within the townships of Dennis and Pennefather, Ontario.

Annual Production approx. 237,000 megawatt-hours per year.

60 GE 1.5 MW sle Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 90 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 27 MW/Hr

Total Prince County 66 + 60 = 126 1.5 MW turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 99 + 90 = 189MW per hour



Ripley Wind Power
http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Page.asp?PageID=924&ContentID=5108

3,600 hectares of lands optioned for wind power development
within the Townships of Huron-Kinloss near the Town of Ripley, in south-western Ontario.

Annual Production approx. 200,000 megawatt-hours per year.

38 ENERCON GmbH E82 Wind Turbines
Nameplate Capacity: 76 MW per hour
Actual Production = approx. 30% = 23 MW/Hr




Note:
For several years The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) - which lobbies on behalf of wind power firms - claimed that electricity from wind turbines 'displaces' 860 grams of carbon dioxide emission for every kilowatt hour of electricity generated.

However it has now halved that figure to 430 grams, following discussions with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

See full article here.

Ontario's wind farms displaced approx. 91,000 grams Carbon dioxide emissions per hour in Dec. 2008.




Source is http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/ieo06/special_topics.html
Cost Element Technology
Coal Natural Gas Wind Nuclear
Capital 30.4 11.4 40.7 42.7
O&M   4.7   1.4   8.3   7.8
Fuel 14.5 36.9   0.0   6.6
  Total 53.1 52.5 55.8 59.3
 
Home | Archives | Comments | How Much Power | How Many Turbines | Contact us | Wind Watch Links |
Through the understanding of the Spirit of God, whom is ALL in ALL, the promise of eternal life is made manifest - All are saved! Migratory Bird Convention Act, Wind Turbine Noise Syndrome Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood Village Ministry of Natural Resources, invest in sustainable industry, EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Migratory Bird Convention Act, Wind Turbine Noise Syndrome Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, windfarms torontohydroenergy.com offshorewind, waterfront, windmills Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood Village Ministry of Natural Resources, invest in sustainable industry, EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Migratory Bird Convention Act, Wind Turbine Noise Syndrome Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, windfarms torontohydroenergy.com offshorewind, waterfront, windmills Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood Village Ministry of Natural Resources, invest in sustainable industry, EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Migratory Bird Convention Act, Wind Turbine Noise Syndrome Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, windfarms torontohydroenergy.com offshorewind, waterfront, windmills Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, wind farms, Toronto Hydro, Ontario, Canada, Guildwood Village Ministry of Natural Resources, invest in sustainable industry, EROSION CONTROL PROJECT Scarborough Bluffs, wind turbines, windfarms